Seeking law firms to assist with filing this public-interest anti-corruption lawsuit ( Participating lawyers can receive a percentage of millions of dollars of potential awards while creating important legal precedents that help protect every citizen from public offices infected by corruption. See the draft notes for the litigation at

Felony Charges Against U.S. Senators And Other Public Officials. The companies charged in this complaint are largely owned by U.S. Senators and their family members, along with major government agency officials. In other words, the companies charged with doing coordinated crimes and corruption are owned by the very people that are responsible for regulating those companies. Those public officials have the means, the motive and the novel ability to manipulate funding for those companies and against their competitors. Forensic data proves that the charged officials have done so. Analysis of financial disclosure data, FINCEN reports and ICIJ leaks shows senators and their spouses have as much as $400M invested in corporate stocks. We have first-hand knowledge of, and experience with, West Coast public officials putting hit-jobs, media attacks, de-funding orders and benefits manipulations on their constituents in order to protect their stock interests.

As they set national policy on important issues such as climate change, tech monopolies, medical debt and income inequality, these US senators have glaring conflicts of interest and have participated in cover-ups of these crimes and attacks on us for reporting them. Speaking of COVER-UPS: 1.) Simone Biles, The U.S. Olympic Gymastics Team and Larry Nasser sex case , 2.) The Jeffrey Epstein sex cult case, 3,) The Gov. Gretchen Whitmer kidnapping case, 4.) The 9/11 families case, and hundreds of other cases prove that government officials cover-up crimes. The victims reported to the FBI, DOJ, GAO, FTC, SEC and Congress in a timely manner and got stonewalled, lied to, attacked and retaliated against simply because they reported a crime! THIS CASE is yet another such case where the crimes were reported long ago but because it involved famous rich people, it was covered up by public officials.

FINCEN, The FBI and the GAO have proven that stock ownership by politicians creates noncontractible quid pro quo relations with firms like Tesla, Google, Facebook and Netflix. The ownership by US Congress members in these firms contributing to their election campaigns is higher than in noncontributors. This bias toward contributors depends on the financial incentives of politicians and the relation’s value. Firms with a stronger ownership–contribution association receive more government contracts, cash and tax waivers, such as Elon Musk’s record-breaking government payola. The financial gains from these contracts are economically large when politicians buy stocks in covert exchange for contributions to the politicians, via insider arrangements. We got harmed by dirty government officials getting paid bribes via insider trading. Now they owe us! See:

This matter covers:
1.) The creation and operation of the disclosed organized crime entity involving public figures
2.) The methods and tactics of the bribery they employed using the stock market
3.) The attacks they operated against whistle-blowers and competitors using government resources, black-listing, funds blockades and dirty tricks services.
4.) The systemized sex trafficking and employee abuse protection scheme they operate
5.) The industrialization of political payola that they enforce using corrupt contracted services and former intelligence agency operatives
6.) Their coordinated violations of free speech and their systemized control of all digital news and information
7.) The harms to the public that they caused
8.) Judges and regulators who reviewed this case who owned the culprits companies:

Now is the time to make things right Email: if your firm is experienced in federal FTCA and related litigation.

The FBI, FINCEN, GAO, the AG and IG have been informed that Joshua Comins, and others, have now disclosed how Nancy Pelosi’s financial dealings gave her $315 million in assets on just a government salary. Organized crime is suspected. If Bay Area politicians get mad at a constituent they can have that constituent “erased” from SSA, HUD and pension benefits, black-listed, media-attacked and utterly destroyed. The United States Department of Energy AND The FCC have taken bribes via stock payments to their staff, executives and lobbyist contractor/advisors. They were paid off to partner with California Senators in order to rig money exclusively to Elon Musk. The ATVM, LGP and Battery funding programs at DOE are nothing but crony payola scams and most of DOE staff should be indicted for conspiracy.

Pelosi, Harris, Feinstein, White House financier Google and George Soros own Elon Musk’s companies. Could any competitor to Musk get a fair shake in commerce or government funding? Never! Where’s the politician’s ‘dirty money’ money coming from?, everyone is asking. House Speaker Nancy Pelosi, D-Calif., has served in Congress for nearly 34 years and presently presides in a top-tier position as one of the most powerful figures in the U.S. government.

Speaker was unable to pass the bipartisan infrastructure bill as progressives in her own party signaled their disapproval. Many have condemned her policies, saying they’re making it “harder and harder for average Americans to accumulate wealth,” shackling them with taxes and “destroying the dollar with reckless spending.” The current salary of a Speaker of the House sits in the low six-figures, yet Pelosi is one of the richest members of Congress. So what is her secret: “It appears to be her husband, Paul.”

“After they got married, Paul opened up a real estate and venture capital firm. Through his connections, he pushed Nancy into the political world, helping her get elected to Congress in 1987,”. This is just like how Dianne Feinstein and Richard Blum hooked up their own deal. The couple has timed the market and insider trading perfectly over the years while Nancy’s been a Washington insider. With real estate and stocks, the Pelosis always know what the right investment is based on her lobbyist deals. The Pelosis own several pieces of real estate including a mansion in Napa Valley valued up to $25 million, a DC waterfront condo worth over $2 million, and a red brick mansion in California’s Pacific Heights. Her husband owns commercial properties in San Francisco “combined, worth up to $50 million. In 2018, the Pelosis’ wealth has skyrocketed. That year, her financial disclosure report revealed a net worth of over $114 million. In 2019, Pelosi’s assets total up to a whopping $271 million and in 2020, those numbers went up even more to as high as $315 million.

In 2007, Visa worried the new Democrat Congress would target their swipe fees, costing them billions. So they hired a team of lobbyists who descended on Pelosi. Visa’s CEO personally met with her. She got donations from them. One of his advisers left and became a VISA lobbyist himself. Suddenly, Paul Pelosi got a phone call from his broker. He was in luck, Paul was offered a prescreened invite to get in early on Visa’s $18 billion IPO. Did Nancy and her husband hesitate? No, they bought between $1 million and $5 million worth of Visa stock. But it gets better. While Pelosi was speaker, bills that would have hurt Visa’s stock price were blocked in the House. Visa shares going up over 200 percent during the time, making the Pelosis a fortune on paper. In January, the Pelosis got a million dollars worth of Tesla stock right before Joe Biden announced electric car incentives in June. The Pelosi family cashed in big time just before Congress was set to pounce on Big Tech. Mr. Pelosi exercised options on Google’s parent company, Alphabet, making an easy $5.3 million. Pelosi, Harris, Feinstein, Google and George Soros own Elon Musk’s companies. Could any competitor to Musk get a fair shake in commerce or government funding? Never! In March, Paul Pelosi exercised $2 million worth of Microsoft options, just two weeks before the tech giant got a $22 billion contract to equip the US Army with high tech headsets. The Pelosis and the Feinsteins have never been indicted for insider trading, but her marriage investments and access, combined with extremely fortunate timing, have created a lot of suspicions. FINCEN, GAO, FBI, ICIJ and private investigators are now following the money, and there sure is a lot of it. There are hundreds of suspected criminal dark money charges that have been pointed at San Francisco Bay Area politicians.

Every public official who attacked Plaintiff: A.) held stock and assets in Plaintiff’s competitors, B.) was compensated by Plaintiff’s competitors, C.) was a member of organizations who paid news, internet and information services to manipulate their output for their own unjust gain, D.) knew that their malicious assertions were false and defamatory, and E.) and otherwise met the legal means test to qualify as violators of federal RICO laws, Human Rights laws, Civil Rights standards and related State and Federal Constitutional rights laws. By rigging HUD, SSA, DOE, and other public benefits determinations, to harm the funding, payments, witness fees, informant fees, whistle-blower awards and stock market profits of adversaries, the Defendants engaged in felony crime. The purpose of this case is to cripple the whole crime organization via numerous charges, which shall be brought against multiple defendants, under multiple liability, which means that prosecutors will find the underlying elements of of these acts and then have conspiracy on top of it, and then each and every charge against the perpetrators is  separate and runs consecutively .

For example when Elon Musk is charged with bribery and conspiracy that charge may have led to 10-15 years in prison in the old days, now under RICO, when found guilty of racketeering he can be fined up to $25,000 and sentenced to 20 years in prison per each racketeering count.

RICO charges, as part of the charge set, will make these convictions easier. In many cases, the threat of a RICO indictment can force these defendants to plead guilty to lesser charges, in part because the seizure of their assets would make it difficult to pay a defense attorney for a case this large. Racketeering and RICO-related crimes are grave and require skilled defense, that is prepared to face the government-assembled legal teams in federal court. Essentially,  “it means the convicted would never see the light of day again, they are never getting out. “

Despite its harsh provisions, these RICO-related charges are easy to prove in court, as they focus on patterns of behavior as opposed to criminal acts. The government officials and their tech oligarch partners were audacious in publicly promoting their crimes and their above-the-law attitudes. RICO, here, also permits a private individual “damaged in his business or property” by a “racketeer” to file a civil suit. The government should, thus, join with Plaintiff in this case.

The plaintiff has proven the existence of an “enterprise“.

The defendant(s) are not the enterprise; in other words, the defendant(s) and the enterprise are not one and the same.

The defendant(s) meet the construct of four specified relationships:

1. the defendant(s) and the enterprise: either the defendant(s) invested the proceeds of the pattern of racketeering activity into the enterprise;

2. the defendant(s) acquired or maintained an interest in, or control of, the enterprise through the pattern of racketeering activity;

3. the defendant(s) conducted or participated in the affairs of the enterprise “through” the pattern of racketeering activity ;

4. the defendant(s) conspired to do all of the above crimes.

The enterprise, herein, is the ‘prize,’ ‘instrument,’ ‘victim,’ or ‘perpetrator’ of the racketeers. A civil RICO action for this matter should be filed in state AND federal court.

We intend that both the criminal and civil components will allow the recovery of treble damages (damages in triple the amount of actual/compensatory damages) for Plaintiff.
Our evidence has focused on patterns of behavior AND criminal acts. We seek multiple liability (charges brought against multiple defendants, which means if prosecutors now find the underlying elements of of these acts, you have conspiracy on top of it) Each and every charge against defendants is separate and runs consecutively. Admissible hearsay evidence is offered in this case. Associative evidence is allowed ( guilt by association meaning if a defendant profited off the crimes of an organization even if he was not directly involved with the crime himself he shall still be charged as a co-conspirator and go all the way up the chain of command). This case structure will incentivize the operatives (soldati) at the corrupt law firms, CPA’s, lobbyists and media outlets to flip, or roll-over, on the bosses.

This case structure allows both the government and Plaintiff to engage in substantial asset seizure (over $900B). The owners of the racketeering shell corporations, real estate scams and trusts are well-known to often abscond with the assets. An injunction and/or performance bond ensures that there is something to seize in the event of a guilty verdict. In addition, the racketeers must forfeit all ill-gotten gains and interest in any business gained through a pattern of “racketeering activity.” Over 1000 false-front shells, trusts, dark money and PAC assets are known to be held by the defendants. While government bosses may be embarrassed, or find this matter “politically awkward”, no citizen in America cares. Any boss who delays or obfuscates this case further should consider that they will, by such action, legally define themselves as a member of the above defined “enterprise” and will be criminally referred to FBI for prosecution. There is no time like TODAY, to get this matter moving. See:

Author: admin

Leave a Reply